THE ECONOMIC DIMENSION OF WATER SECURITY UNDER CONDITIONS OF VALUE PLURALISM

THE ECONOMIC DIMENSION OF WATER SECURITY UNDER CONDITIONS OF VALUE PLURALISM

Authors

  • Nazarii Dibrova Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine
  • Mariia Ruda Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.17.04.2026.034

Keywords:

water security, water resource economics, plurality of values, ecological sustainability, water use management

Summary

The concept of water security today is shaped within a space where different, often conflicting, understandings of the value of water intersect. Attempts to treat water solely as an economic resource with clearly measurable parameters increasingly fail to reflect real-world conditions, as hydrological systems are subject to substantial anthropogenic pressure and the consequences of disrupted balance are becoming global in scale. The narrow utilitarian approach is gradually being replaced by a perspective that views water through the lenses of ecological sustainability, social justice, and cultural significance. This shift is further reinforced in the context of global population growth, escalating food security challenges, and deepening water scarcity, which make it impossible to ignore the human right to access water and food.

Of particular importance is the question of how different value regimes—ecological, social, and economic—coexist and how they shape the available hydrological space. Attempts to simultaneously account for food production needs, the rights of water as an integral component of ecosystems, and commercial interests give rise to a complex system of interdependencies. The narrowing gap between ecological constraints and human demands indicates that water security is not a static condition but a continuous process of balancing biophysical limits with social expectations. For this reason, water security is increasingly understood not as a purely technical indicator, but as a dynamic framework in which natural, cultural, economic, and political dimensions are deeply intertwined.

Within this approach, it becomes essential to recognize that water cannot be assessed outside the context of the values that define the boundaries of what is possible. Different interpretations of the role of water generate distinct conceptions of justice, acceptable hydrological pressures, and the prioritization of uses. Consequently, contemporary water security challenges require not only adjustments to technical models but also a deeper rethinking of the relationship between society and water systems. This perspective allows water security to be understood as a multidimensional space in which diverse values coexist and interact, ultimately shaping the future trajectory of water policy at the global scale.

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beltran-Peña, A., Rosa, L., & D’Odorico, P. (2020). Global food security and blue water use: The need for a multidisciplinary perspective. Environmental Research Letters, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5f3c DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9388

Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. MIT Press.

Doeffinger, A., Janmaat, J., Reiter, M., & et al. (2020). A multi-indicator assessment of freshwater security. Science of the Total Environment, 737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139700

Feldman, D. L. (2007). Water policy for sustainable development. Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.3503

Gleeson, T., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Zipper, S., & et al. (2020). The water planetary boundary: A roadmap to address water scarcity. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0095-6

Hoekstra, A. Y. (2020). The water footprint concept and its use in sustainable water management. Water, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061820

Kallhoff, A. (2014). Why water matters: Philosophical reflections. Springer.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., & et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., & et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855

Whyte, K. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55(1), 153–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153

Zeitoun, M., Lankford, B., Krueger, T., & et al. (2016). A framework for assessing national water security. Global Environmental Change, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.010

Author Biographies

Nazarii Dibrova, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

PhD student, Department of Ecological Safety and Nature Protection Activity

Mariia Ruda, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

PhD in Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor Associate Professor, Department of Ecological Safety and Nature Protection Activity

Downloads

Published

17.04.2026

Number of views 58

How to Cite

Dibrova, N., & Ruda, M. (2026). THE ECONOMIC DIMENSION OF WATER SECURITY UNDER CONDITIONS OF VALUE PLURALISM. Grail of Science, (66), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.17.04.2026.034

Google Scholar

OUCI

OpenAIRE

CrossRef

Index Copernicus

Semantic Scholar

Scilit

ResearchGate

WorldCat

Mendeley

Loading...