ENHANCING THE PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF CRITICAL FACILITIES THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF PHYSICAL PROCESS MODELS AND MACHINE LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.083Keywords:
critical facilities, physical protection, physical process models, machine learning, hybrid modeling, detection probability, delay, response, risk assessment, decision supportSummary
This paper substantiates a hybrid approach to enhancing the physical protection of critical facilities through the integration of physical process models and machine learning methods. It is shown that conventional deterministic and probabilistic models of physical protection provide high explainability and regulatory compliance, yet exhibit limited adaptability under conditions of a dynamically changing operational environment, sensor data instability, and parameter uncertainty. The proposed methodology combines the preservation of causal logic inherent in physics-based models with the adaptive capabilities of machine learning, primarily for updating the probability of detection using operational and historical data. A structured integration framework is formulated, incorporating a physical process model, a machine learning module, and an alignment block that enforces physical and regulatory constraints. The paper presents a mathematical formulation of protection effectiveness as a joint function of detection, delay, and response components, as well as an adaptive scheme for operational risk updating and the selection of protective measures. The results demonstrate that the hybrid approach improves assessment realism, robustness to uncertainty, and the scientific validity of decision-making in the protection of critical facilities.
Downloads
Downloads
References
Garcia, M. L. (2008). The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-055428-0.50005-1
IAEA. (2011). Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities (INFCIRC/225/Revision 5) (IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 13). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1481_web.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Strosinski, M. V. (2010). Basics of Physical Protection Systems (SAND2010-6737C). Sandia National Laboratories.
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1122432?utm_source=chatgpt.com
IAEA. (2018). Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities: Implementation of INFCIRC/225/Revision 5 (IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 27-G). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB1760_web.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
IAEA. (2021). Technical Guidance on Physical Protection Systems and Measures (IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 40-T). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB1875_web.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Bennett, H. A. (1977). EASI (Estimate of Adversary Sequence Interruption): An evaluation method for physical security systems. Nuclear Materials Management, 6(3), 371–379. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/easi-estimate-adversary-sequence-interruption-evaluation-method?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), Article 15, 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
Hall, D. L., & Llinas, J. (1997). An introduction to multisensor data fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.554205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/5.554205
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. G. (2025). Quantitative categorization of facilities and modeling of potential adversaries. Grail of Science, (60), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.26.12.2025.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.26.12.2025.049
Talibov, A. M., Hashimov, E. G., & Akhundov, R. G. (2025). Modeling and forecasting radiological and chemical threats in the military sphere. In Current directions of development of information and communication technologies and control tools: Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Technical Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 120-121).
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. (2025, November). Enhancing the efficiency of the military environmental security system through the implementation of advanced technical means. In Modeling, Control and Information Technologies: Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference (No. 8, pp. 348-352). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31713/MCIT.2025.108
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories