CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION OF AN INTEGRAL SECURITY INDICATOR FOR ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS FACILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.20.02.2026.109Keywords:
potentially hazardous facility, integral security indicator, constrained optimization, decision support, adaptive management, risk constraint, feedback, effectiveness measureSummary
The subject matter of the article is quantitative assessment and adaptive decision-making for managing the safety state of potentially hazardous facilities using an integral security indicator. The goal is to develop a mathematical framework for selecting an optimal management action that maximizes the indicator under resource, time, and acceptable risk constraints. The tasks are: (i) to formalize the facility state as a normalized vector of indicators and construct the integral indicator A(t); (ii) to formulate a constrained optimization model for selecting the optimal action v*(t) based on maximizing A(t); (iii) to define a periodic update and feedback mechanism and an effectiveness measure η for evaluating actions across decision cycles. The methods used are multi-criteria aggregation in a normalized indicator space, constrained optimization, argmax-based decision rules, and iterative feedback evaluation. The following results were obtained: an indicator-based state model and integral security indicator were constructed for compact decision support; a constrained selection problem was defined for a discrete action set with cost, implementation time, and risk admissibility constraints; and an operational loop of reassessment, action application, and feedback was specified, enabling adaptive refinement of decisions and visualization of A(t_k) dynamics. Conclusions. Scientific novelty: 1) an integrated constrained-optimization scheme that maximizes an integral security indicator while jointly accounting for cost, time, and risk constraints; 2) a feedback-enabled adaptive control loop with η and periodic reassessment to improve action selection under changing conditions.
Downloads
Downloads
References
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process: What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73–79. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). The use of unmanned systems and artificial intelligence to enhance radiation and chemical safety in military ecology. In Innovations and the scientific potential of the world: Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference (pp. 183–192). Sumy, Ukraine: Ukrlogos Group. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-10.10.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-10.10.2025
Hashimov, E. et al. (2026). Research of the effıcıency multıservıce networks usıng MIMO technology. Advanced Information Systems, 10(1), 66-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2026.1.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2026.1.08
Akhundov, R., Hashimov, E. G., & Islamov, I. (2026). Conceptual models of multi-level physical protection systems for special-purpose and critical infrastructure facilities. Grail of Science, (61), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.066
Williams, B. K., & Brown, E. D. (2014). Adaptive management: From more talk to real action. Environmental Management, 53(2), 465–479. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7
Celik, E., Gul, M., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T., & Guneri, A.F. (2015). A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 85, 329–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.004
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. (2026). Enhancing the physical protection of critical facilities through the integration of physical process models and machine learning. Grail of Science, (61), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.083
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Prospects for the use of robotic complexes in eliminating the consequences of environmental accidents at military facilities. In Achievements and advancements of applied and fundamental sciences of the 21st century: Proceedings of the X International Scientific Conference (pp. 301–311). Dnipro, Ukraine: Ukrlogos Group. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-07.11.2025
Tučník, P., Bureš, V. (2016). Experimental evaluation of suitability of selected multi-criteria decision-making methods for large-scale agent-based simulations. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165171. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165171
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. G. (2025). Quantitative categorization of facilities and modeling of potential adversaries. Grail of Science, (60), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.26.12.2025.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.26.12.2025.049
Talibov, A. M., Hashimov, E. G., & Akhundov, R. G. (2025). Modeling and forecasting radiological and chemical threats in the military sphere. In Current directions of development of information and communication technologies and control tools: Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Technical Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 120-121).
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. (2025, November). Enhancing the efficiency of the military environmental security system through the implementation of advanced technical means. In Modeling, Control and Information Technologies: Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference (No. 8, pp. 348-352). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31713/MCIT.2025.108
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Innovative approaches to environmental recovery in conflict-affected areas. In Scientific discoveries and fundamental research: World experience: Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference (pp. 180–190). Zhytomyr, Ukraine: Ukrlogos Group. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-24.10.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-24.10.2025
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Integrating environmental security into defense strategy with a focus on radiological and chemical risks. Strategic directions of science development: Factors of influence and interaction: Collection of scientific papers with materials of the VII International Scientific Conference (September 26, 2025, Cherkasy, Ukraine) (pp. 115–125). https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-26.09.2025
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Big data analytics and machine learning for predicting radiation and chemical threats in the military sphere. Theory and practice of modern science: Collection of scientific papers «SCIENTIA» with proceedings of the X International Scientific and Theoretical Conference (September 26, 2025, Kraków, Republic of Poland) (pp. 30–38). https://doi.org/10.36074/scientia-26.09.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/scientia-26.09.2025
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Hybrid communication models for UAV swarms: Towards scalable and energy-aware network optimization. Scientific guidelines: Theory and practice of research – Proceedings of the VI International Scientific Conference (Kyiv, Ukraine, October 3, 2025), pp. 185–195. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-03.10.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-03.10.2025
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Controller-level scalability problems in software-defined networks. In Problems of Informatization: Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 70–71).
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories