SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS OF PHYSICAL PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.20.03.2026.074Keywords:
physical protection system, design process, systems analysis, technological stage, risk-oriented approach, protection architecture, threat model, effectivenessSummary
The article examines the technological process of physical protection system design on the basis of a systems approach. It is shown that this process is not limited to the technical selection of protection means, but also encompasses closely interconnected stages such as assessment of the threat environment, analysis of the functional structure of the protected facility, consideration of spatial and temporal constraints, allocation of resources, and alignment of effectiveness criteria. The design process is presented as a multi-level system consisting of input data, analytical procedures, decision blocks, and output indicators. Based on the systems analysis, it is established that the effectiveness of a physical protection system is determined not by the mere presence of individual technical elements, but by the functional integration of detection, delay, and response mechanisms. The proposed methodological approach makes it possible to identify structural interrelations within the design process, detect weak points at an early stage, and support risk-oriented decision-making. As a result, the scientific and practical significance of applying systems analysis for more substantiated, adaptive, and efficient design of physical protection systems is justified.
Downloads
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elshan Hashimov, Ramil Akhundov, Aziz Talibov, Islam Islamov
References
Garcia, M. L. Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems. 2nd ed. Elsevier, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-25612-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-055428-0.50005-1
Hashimov, E., Akhundov, R., Talibov, A., & Islamov, I. (2026). Decision support for physical protection systems using route-level metrics and simulation-based evaluation. Grail of Science, (63), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.06.03.2026.059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.06.03.2026.059
Lovecek, T., Ristvej, J., & Simak, L. (2010). Critical Infrastructure Protection Systems Effectiveness Evaluation. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1613
Akhundov, R., Hashimov, E. G., & Islamov, I. (2026). Scenario oriented sufficiency criteria for physical protection systems provide a traceable path from threat classes to design requirements. Grail of Science, (63). https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.06.03.2026.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.06.03.2026.074
Kampova, K., Lovecek, T., & Řehák, D. (2020). Quantitative approach to physical protection systems assessment of critical infrastructure elements: Use case in the Slovak Republic. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 30, 100376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100376
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Controller-level scalability problems in software-defined networks. In Problems of Informatization: Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 70–71).
Hashimov, E., Akhundov, R. G., Talibov, A. M., & Islamov, I. (2026). Constrained optimization of an integral security indicator for adaptive management of hazardous facilities. Grail of Science, (62), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.20.02.2026.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.20.02.2026.109
El Wely, I. C., Chetaine A. (2020). Analysis of physical protection system effectiveness of nuclear power plants based on performance approach. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 153, 108051. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107980
Akhundov, R., Hashimov, E. G., & Islamov, I. (2026). Methodological limitations of normative design of physical protection systems for critical and military facilities in a dynamic threat environment. International scientific journal «Grail of Science», DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.20.02.2026.096
(62), 873–889.
Hashimov, E. et al. (2026). Research of the effıcıency multıservıce networks usıng MIMO technology. Advanced Information Systems, 10(1), 66-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2026.1.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2026.1.08
Zou, B., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Benjamin, E.-R., Tan, K., Wu, W., & Yoshikawa, H. (2018). Evaluation of vulnerable path: Using heuristic path-finding algorithm in physical protection system of nuclear power plant. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 23, 90–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.08.006
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). The use of unmanned systems and artificial intelligence to enhance radiation and chemical safety in military ecology. In Innovations and the scientific potential of the world: Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference (pp. 183–192). https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-10.10.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-10.10.2025
Akhundov, R., Hashimov, E. G., & Islamov, I. (2026). Conceptual models of multi-level physical protection systems for special-purpose and critical infrastructure facilities. Grail of Science, (61), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.066
Yang, J., Huang, L., Ma, H., Xu, Z., Yang, M., & Guo, S. (2022). A 2D-graph model-based heuristic approach to visual backtracking security vulnerabilities in physical protection systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 38, 100554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100554
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Innovative approaches to environmental recovery in conflict-affected areas. In Scientific discoveries and fundamental research: World experience: Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference (pp. 180–190). Zhytomyr, Ukraine: Ukrlogos Group. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-24.10.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-24.10.2025
Řehák, D., Senovsky, P., Hromada, M., & Lovecek, T. (2019). Complex approach to assessing resilience of critical infrastructure elements. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 25, 125–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.03.003
Rehak, D., Slivkova, S., Janeckova, H., Stuberova, D., & Hromada, M. (2022). Strengthening Resilience in the Energy Critical Infrastructure: Methodological Overview. Energies, 15(14), 5276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145276
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. (2026). Enhancing the physical protection of critical facilities through the integration of physical process models and machine learning. Grail of Science, (61), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.01.2026.083
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Integrating environmental security into defense strategy with a focus on radiological and chemical risks. Strategic directions of science development: Factors of influence and interaction: Collection of scientific papers with materials of the VII International Scientific Conference (September 26, 2025, Cherkasy, Ukraine) (pp. 115–125). https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-26.09.2025
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. G. (2025). Quantitative categorization of facilities and modeling of potential adversaries. Grail of Science, (60), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.26.12.2025.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.26.12.2025.049
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Hybrid communication models for UAV swarms: Towards scalable and energy-aware network optimization. Scientific guidelines: Theory and practice of research – Proceedings of the VI International Scientific Conference (Kyiv, Ukraine, October 3, 2025), pp. 185–195. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-03.10.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-03.10.2025
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Big data analytics and machine learning for predicting radiation and chemical threats in the military sphere. Theory and practice of modern science: Collection of scientific papers «SCIENTIA» with proceedings of the X International Scientific and Theoretical Conference (September 26, 2025, Kraków, Republic of Poland) (pp. 30–38). https://doi.org/10.36074/scientia-26.09.2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/scientia-26.09.2025
Talibov, A. M., Hashimov, E. G., & Akhundov, R. G. (2025). Modeling and forecasting radiological and chemical threats in the military sphere. In Current directions of development of information and communication technologies and control tools: Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Technical Conference
(Vol. 1, pp. 120-121).
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 393–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595440
Akhundov, R., & Islamov, I. (2025, November). Military Environmental Security under Radiation and Chemical Threats. In Modeling, Control and Information Technologies: Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference (No. 8, pp. 414-419). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31713/MCIT.2025.129
Genserik L.L. Reniers, Amaryllis Audenaert (2014). Preparing for major terrorist attacks against chemical clusters: Intelligently planning protection measures w.r.t. domino effects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(6), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.04.002
Akhundov, R., & Hashimov, E. (2025, November). Enhancing the efficiency of the military environmental security system through the implementation of advanced technical means. In Modeling, Control and Information Technologies: Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference (No. 8, pp. 348-352). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31713/MCIT.2025.108
Islamov, I. et al. (2025). Prospects for the use of robotic complexes in eliminating the consequences of environmental accidents at military facilities. In Achievements and advancements of applied and fundamental sciences of the 21st century: Proceedings of the X International Scientific Conference (pp. 301–311). Dnipro, Ukraine: Ukrlogos Group. https://doi.org/10.62731/mcnd-07.11.2025
Mondal, S., Adak, B., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2023). Functional and smart textiles for military and defence applications. In Smart and functional textiles (p. 397). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110759747-011
Shoop, B., et al. (2006). Mobile detection assessment and response systems (MDARS): A force protection physical security operational success. In Unmanned Systems Technology VIII (Vol. 6230, pp. 668–678). SPIE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.665939
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
